Who Controls AI-powered operating systems?

The New Gatekeepers: Who Controls the User in the Era of AI Powered Operating Systems?

The world of consumer technology is on the brink of a monumental shift. A new wave of AI powered devices and intelligent assistants is rapidly emerging, promising to redefine our daily interactions with the digital world. At the core of this transformation lie the developing AI powered operating systems, foundational platforms that could soon manage everything from our shopping to our schedules. These systems are not just another software update; they represent a fundamental change in how we access services and information.

As Silicon Valley giants like OpenAI, Amazon, and Meta pour resources into creating these new ecosystems, a critical power struggle is taking shape. The traditional app model, long governed by Apple and Google, faces a potential disruption. Instead of users downloading individual apps, AI agents may soon perform tasks directly, creating a more fluid but also more centralized experience. This evolution brings a pressing question to the forefront: in this new paradigm, who truly controls the user? As we delegate more tasks to AI, we must carefully consider who sets the rules, who profits from our actions, and who ultimately holds the power in this unfolding technological revolution.

AI Powered Operating Systems: Strategies, Developer Platforms, and the Clash Over Revenue Models

The race to build the dominant AI powered operating systems is intensifying, with tech giants and startups adopting distinct strategies. At the heart of this competition is a fundamental tension between creating seamless user experiences and preserving the existing business models that power the internet. Consequently, companies are navigating a complex landscape where the future of AI apps, developer platforms, and advertising revenue hangs in the balance.

Several major players are making significant moves:

• OpenAI and Amazon: Both companies are aggressively building out their ecosystems by partnering with established services. For example, OpenAI has brought services like DoorDash and Expedia into ChatGPT as early forms of AI apps. Similarly, Amazon is enhancing its Alexa+ with agent like features from Ticketmaster and Uber. These collaborations demonstrate a strategy to become the primary interface for consumer actions, effectively bypassing traditional app stores. However, Amazon has also shown its willingness to protect its territory, as seen in its lawsuit against Perplexity over an agent that could make purchases.
• Emerging Players like Rabbit: Startups are also entering the fray, though not without challenges. Rabbit’s R1 device, which debuted at CES 2024, aimed to create a simplified, agent based user experience. However, it struggled to gain cooperation from major app developers. Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu explained the resistance, stating, “You have to understand why they’re not super happy: They sell… advertisements. That’s where many of them make money.” This highlights the core conflict: AI agents threaten the advertising model that many apps rely on. The potential for these agents to access and use data also raises security questions, leading some to wonder, Are All Access AI agents Leaking Data?.

This struggle leads to a critical question about monetization. If AI agents disrupt the advertising revenue streams, what will replace them? Anjney Midha, a venture capitalist, frames the problem clearly. “If the consumer is not going to pay, then the ad model needs to be contended with, but it just might not work here. That’s an unanswered question.” This uncertainty defines the current era as every platform wrestles with how to fund these powerful new services.

Comparing the Ecosystems: How AI Platforms and Business Models Differ

To better understand the shifting landscape, it is helpful to compare the strategies of key players. The following table breaks down the different approaches to building AI powered operating systems, from established giants to nimble startups. It highlights how their business models and challenges reveal the underlying tensions in the race to control the next generation of user interaction.

Navigating a Landscape of Resistance and Restraint

The path to building a successful AI powered operating system is filled with significant hurdles for both developers and users. The core challenge stems from a fundamental clash with the internet’s established business models. Many app developers depend heavily on advertising revenue, a model directly threatened by AI agents that can perform tasks without forcing users to view ads. Consequently, this creates an environment of resistance.

Developer cooperation has become a major roadblock. As Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu noted, many developers are not eager to partner with new AI platforms because doing so could undermine their primary income source. This reluctance limits the functionality of emerging AI devices and operating systems, forcing them to rely on less efficient workarounds instead of seamless API access. Without deep integration, the user experience can feel clunky and incomplete, which hinders widespread adoption. Successfully leading a company through these strategic minefields requires a clear vision, something akin to Intentional AI automation and leadership.

Beyond developer reluctance, legal battles are emerging as a key challenge. For instance, Amazon’s lawsuit against Perplexity AI highlights how established giants are prepared to defend their ecosystems. Such legal disputes create uncertainty for startups and can stifle innovation by closing off access to essential platforms. Furthermore, user behavior has not yet fully aligned with the vision of AI powered commerce. A September report revealed that only 2.1 percent of ChatGPT users sought information about purchasing products. This low figure suggests that while AI holds great potential, winning consumer trust and changing habits will be a slow and challenging process.

The Future of Control in AI Ecosystems

The emergence of AI powered operating systems marks a pivotal moment in consumer technology. However, the path forward is complex, defined by a fundamental struggle between innovation and established economic models. The core question of who controls the user experience remains unanswered, as tech giants and startups alike grapple with developer resistance, legal hurdles, and the challenge of creating sustainable business models that move beyond advertising. While the promise of seamless, intelligent assistants is compelling, the industry must first resolve these deep seated tensions.

As this new landscape matures, navigating its complexities will be crucial for businesses aiming to stay competitive. Innovators like EMP0 (Employee Number Zero, LLC) are at the forefront of this transition. Specializing in AI and automation, EMP0 builds secure, brand trained AI powered growth systems that help clients multiply their revenue. For organizations looking to harness the power of AI and adapt to the evolving world of intelligent operating systems, EMP0 provides the expertise needed to build a strategic advantage. To learn more about their work, you can visit their blog at articles.emp0.com.

Follow EMP0’s journey and insights on their social platforms:

• Twitter/X: @Emp0_com
• Medium: medium.com/@jharilela
• n8n: n8n.io/creators/jay-emp0

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)